Connect with us

Tech

Trader: Big Tech is using layoffs to crush the workforce

Published

on

In Silicon Valley, the new year began as the last year ended — tens of thousands of tech workers lost their jobs. A few days into 2023, Amazon CEO Andrew Jassy announce There will be 18,000 layoffs across the company. Within weeks, Microsoft revealed that it was backing off Its head count is 10,000 Google said it was Termination of 12,000 employees. IBM is looking to be next, with Nearly 4,000 workers on the chopping block.

It comes on the heels of the bloodbath of 2022, when tens of thousands of jobs were lost at Meta Platforms, Twitter and Salesforce. to me Industry layoffs trackerThe technology sector has cut about 220,000 jobs since the beginning of last year. If laid-off tech workers formed a city, it would be one of the most populous in the United States, and larger than Des Moines Or Salt Lake City.

The question is: why have so many of the most profitable companies of our generation—most of them still very profitable—announced dizzying rounds of layoffs, one after another? And why now?

Advertisement

joint abstinence from Analysts And correspondents Is that companies are “tightening their belts” after the exorbitant waves of pandemic hiring, in order to streamline operations. Executives overseeing the cuts, for their part, pointed to adverse economic conditions. “We have employed a different economic reality than the one we face today,” said Sundar Pichai, CEO of Google. Discharge announcement. “Amazon has navigated difficult and uncertain economies in the past, and we will continue to do so,” Jassy writes. Satya Nadella from Microsoft Notice that “Some parts of the world are in a recession and other parts are anticipating a recession.”

No recession has yet hit the US or its technology sector. Inflation hurts, but the US economy It added hundreds of thousands of jobs Last month. Still, some contributors They’ve been vocal about wanting to see their heads cut off — and cut back even more.

to that end, critics argue That simple greed is driving the layoffs. They point to the tens of billions in share buybacks that tech companies authorized last year. Liz Lobato is on edge Talk to industry analysts Who said tech companies evaluate their bottom line differently, and concluded that they lay off workers mostly because others do, even though they lay off workers more often cost funds of a particular company. The fact that all of these layoffs are happening in such rapid succession gives companies some coverage — making them seem essential and inevitable.

So what is really going on here? The answer may actually be very simple.

“Controlling labor costs through periodic layoffs is like breathing in Silicon Valley: periodic, essential to life,” Malcolm Harris, author of the forthcoming bookPalo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World,” tell me. Layoffs, Harris says, “have little to do with long-term or even medium-term strategy except in terms of cultivating an insecure workforce”.

Advertisement

That aligns with the economic realities we face today, as the chief technology officer might put it. Because while the recession hasn’t arrived yet in any meaningful form, there is he Another economic indicator indicating willingness to lay off workers from a large employer’s perspective: A growing effort to organize tech workers in Unusually narrow job market.

Technology staff salaries jump over the during the past two yearsTheir negotiating power has begun to grow, too. Over the past half-decade, tech industry insiders have moved for changes that executives find increasingly uncomfortable.

At Google, they spoke out against gender inequality and Pressure the company to drop a lucrative defense contract. At Amazon and Microsoft, they protested lackluster climate policies and pushed those companies to make pledges to reduce carbon emissions. On Facebook and Twitter, workers rallied against content moderation decisions about keeping former President Trump on the platform after January 6, 2021. A subset of Google employees formed the Alphabet Workers Union with the Communications Workers of America union, Amazons founded Amazon Employees for Climate Justice, And at Microsoft, employees of video game subsidiary ZeniMax formed the first certified association ever recognized by the company.

The tangible gains made by regulating tech workers so far may be relatively small, but rising salaries and growing organizational capacity threaten the tech giants’ bottom line and the brand of executive sovereignty prized in Silicon Valley. Elon Musk’s mass Twitter firing last year, and his public demand that “hardcore” programmers dedicated to his software remain at the company, is useful here, not least because other tech execs have He said his approach was inspiring When choosing jobs in their own company.

Workers in an industry that has long had a reputation for union neutrality at best were forming bonds, organizing and developing solidarity. Layoffs of this magnitude and so suddenly can be a blow to the process.

Advertisement

Affected tech workers told me they were struck by the randomness of the shootings; Seniors in good standing, brilliant colleagues with stellar performance reviews, all showed the door, with little rhyme or reason. Many seemed to wonder why they were saved while their peers were not.

Her layoff this month was a “huge surprise,” Alejandra Petit, director of technical programs at Alphabet subsidiary Verily, told me. For one thing, she identified herself as being in good standing in the company. “I was a high performer, considered a pillar of the local community in my Boulder, Colorado office. Now I’m not even allowed back in, not even as a visitor.” Beatty was also struck by the number of quitters who were performing jobs critical to keeping Essential Products running.

If there is one thing the expulsion of people on a large scale and seemingly indiscriminate way achieves, it is that it instills a sense of vulnerability, even fear, in those who remain.

“It’s absolutely devastating, both for the people who were laid off and their families, and colleagues, who felt, that day, and will feel it for a long time after, that they’re in danger,” said Skylar Hinnant, lead quality assurance tester for Microsoft’s ZeniMax branch. “.

Hinnant said he knows a lot of people who’ve lost their jobs via Microsoft — everyone knows that. “You can be the most important engineer at your job, you can be a great programmer, at the end of the day if the algorithm wants to go.

Advertisement

“I think it awakens people to some truths about what the industry really looks like. We are workers. Even though we have advantages and we’re highly trained – we’re still workers. We can still arbitrarily lose our jobs just like everyone else.”

Beatty has been a prominent member of the AWU, advocating in media interviews for reproductive rights in the workplace. She was always civil and constructive, she says, and she felt her suggestions were well received by management. Now she often thinks about whether it was vengeful to end her relationship. In the end, I decided the layoffs were too big, too automated to target directly. “I guess I was another digit in whatever crazy algorithm the consulting firm used to figure out the cuts,” she said.

Elsewhere, there are signs of reversing the hard-won progress of tech workers. Bloomberg reported that at companies like Twitter, Meta, Amazon, and Redfin that have promised to improve employee diversity, layoffs have eliminated departments responsible for diversity, equality, and inclusion, or DEI initiatives.

On Tuesday, workers for Cognizant, a major contractor for Alphabet and YouTube, said: File a complaint With the National Labor Relations Board who were retaliated against for announcing their decision to join the AWU. They say Alphabet changed its policy to make moving to Austin, Texas, mandatory for all workers, and failure to comply will result in “voluntary termination.” Workers say this is against NLRB rules, which state that no major policy can be changed once regulation is announced.

The tech industry has certainly shown that it will go to great lengths to reduce workers’ wages and power. In 2015, Apple, Google and other technology companies He agreed to pay $415– A million settlement After a lawsuit alleged that companies colluded to keep wages low with a “no poaching” agreement between CEOs.

Advertisement

But the massive cutbacks ripping through departments today need not be retaliatory to register a debilitating and destabilizing effect, to help tech giants consolidate control over their workforces and emphasize their fragility.

“Nice companies and all the perks,” said Beatty, “none of them are really useful if you’re constantly worrying, ‘Well, am I going to be the next to be arbitrarily given away?’” “”

The clinical rigors with which layoffs have been carried out often help underscore this point — Google employees show up for work only to discover their keycards have been deactivated, workers have been locked out of email accounts and are never allowed into offices again, not even To say goodbye to colleagues who have worked with them for years.

The tech sector appears to be betting that massive, algorithmically-coordinated firefights will not only drive down labor costs, but also remind increasingly empowered tech workers of their own insecurities, and the power corporations still wield. It’s a bet that paid off historically and helped turn tech giants into some of the most profitable companies in history.

But there is a possibility that things will be different this time.

Advertisement

“It’s very exciting,” said Beatty. The Alphabet Workers Union held a meeting shortly after the layoffs were announced. She said: “Over 1,000 people joined, and another 800 tried to sign up for it after it started. It was big enough that we broke Zoom, and we couldn’t do breakout rooms.”

Hinnant, ZeniMax’s quality assurance tester, is also an organizer in Microsoft’s newly recognized consortium. “I think it kindled a fire with a lot of people thinking about organizing,” he says. “I have friends at Microsoft, Google, and across the industry and I’ve got… Much of calls. “

And unlike the mass layoffs of the past, there is now a foundation of organized workers in place, even if it is emerging, with the ability to provide Salt Lake City’s population of displaced workers with some resources and support.

Beatty says one of the first things the AWU did was create a Slack channel and Discord server where laid-off workers could connect, communicate, exchange information, and lead work.

“It was very helpful to have a place to go and talk to other people who were affected,” Beatty said. “And then we had people who weren’t laid off who joined in to support them, to say goodbye.”

Advertisement

And soon, thousands of laid-off workers were joining the channel, not just from Google, but from Meta, and across the industry. “This has been a huge help in understanding the terminology, what you can and can’t do, and in this place where people are like, ‘Oh, I’m panicking, talk about it,’” she said. “It might become a networking space — we allow some recruiters by entering. They all need work now, you know.”

Workers provided informal, ad hoc counseling services and helped those who could no longer access their email, computers, or HR contacts get information and answers. “When you’re struggling with what just happened, it’s good to have people who can help you with that,” said Beatty. “There are people on visas or parental leave who say, ‘How do I navigate this now?’” I was putting together some of these questions to pass on, and someone who was here on a visa said, “Can you ask them how long until I get deported?”

Above all, workers like Beatty and Hinnant say it is spurring interest in more regulation of tech workers. “I think this really highlights the need for people not only in the Microsoft ecosystem, but across the industry to get organized,” he says. “I think that was a wake-up call. There’s a wave coming. And there’s no stopping it.”

Betty feels the same. She is still hurt by the layoff but hopes to benefit from it. She says, “If I don’t get anything else out of this, I hope to see AWU grow exponentially. Then the sacrifice will be worth it.”



Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Tech

A reporter from Stanford University is behind an explosive investigation

Published

on

By

On the same day as the story was published, Ecclesiastes I launched an investigation at Tessier-Lavigne’s research and seven years of alleged scientific misconduct detailed in the Stanford Daily story.

“It was absolutely amazing,” said Sam Catania, editor-in-chief of the Stanford Daily. “I can’t say I expected the board of trustees to act quickly.” But he said the launch of the investigation “has become just another news event for us.” Baker continued to cover the story, revealing that the photo could have been tampered with Additional papers Co-authored by Tessier-Lavigne. He also spoke about invitations to the rector get down and the Expanding the group of people which will investigate allegations of scientific misconduct. (You can read all of the Stanford Daily coverage here.)

On February 17, three days before the Polk Prize winners were announced, Baker posted another Huge story Debunking accusations that Tessier-Lavigne had falsified data in a 2009 paper that identified a possible cause of brain degeneration in Alzheimer’s patients.

Baker said his personal interaction with Tessier-Lavigne was brief. He reached out to the university’s president shortly after emailing him asking for comment on the story about the alleged Alzheimer’s data. I went up to him. I just said, “Hi,” and he said, “Oh yeah, yeah. I received your message. I look forward to being in touch. Im in a hurry.’

Advertisement

“I started to say something,” Baker continued, “and he slammed his car door halfway through my sentence.” “Of course, he never came back to us. His lawyer did.”

Shortly after the Alzheimer’s story was published, Tessier-Lavigne sent a letter to Stanford faculty and staff Attacking the student newspaper’s reports as “full of lies”.

Tessier-Lavigne’s letter reinforced Baker’s conviction that his stories would never have been published if the Stanford Daily had not been an organization operating outside the control of the academic establishment. (The newspaper celebrates the 50th anniversary of its independence from the university this year.) “The stakes are very high,” Baker said. “The person we are writing about is literally responsible for all of us.”

Both the Stanford Daily reporter and editor-in-chief bash questions about the impact their investigation might have on Tessier-Lavin’s tenure as university president.

“We just want to report the facts and we want to get them right. That’s what’s most important to us,” Catania said. “You know, whatever happens, if at the end of the day we were fair, we were accurate, we were accurate. For me, that would be “mission accomplished” on the newspaper side.

Advertisement

For his part, Baker said he just wanted to “know the truth about exactly what happened.” He added, “I try not to think too much about what’s going to happen based on all of this. The thing I’ve spent most of the time thinking about is making sure we get it right, making sure we get it as comprehensive as possible. I’m not responsible for passing judgment; people will get there.” Others come to their conclusions. So my only job here is just to go on and find out what’s really out there.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

The untold story of notorious influencer Andrew Tate

Published

on

By

despite their attempts In gaining fame and fortune on TV, it was in the kickboxing gym where the brothers really thrived. They attend Storm Gym in Luton, a well-equipped facility in an old warehouse on a commercial estate, under the tutelage of Emir Subasic, an ex-military kickboxer, who becomes close with them and their family.

The staff at the gym declined to comment on Andrew or Tristan, and the gym’s location was recently updatedRemoval Descriptions Andrew as “one of the most devastating fighters” and Tristan as “a war machine”.

Johal, the gym owner from Leicestershire, believed Andrew was a skilled kickboxer and admired the way he fought with his hand, a high-risk strategy that allows fighters to bob and weave quickly but exposes them to knockout risks.

Johal suspects that Andrew learned his knack for self-promotion during his years as a fighter. “Andrew was always a little bit controversial. Sometimes you have to be the bad cop,” Johal said, explaining that the big money and fights go to the loudest boxers.

Advertisement

“Andrew learned that a long time ago. He always said things to get people to support them, to get noticed. Nothing like that,” Johal said as a person. He added that Andrew used to go to kickboxing forums on the internet and write controversial things to get attention for his matches.

Ibrahim Al-Bastati, the Dutch kickboxer who defeated Andrew and won the championship belt in 2016, told Mirror That alpha male personality is just a verb. He told the newspaper, “He’s lying to a lot of people, he’s not the person he says he is.” “I know him very well, Andrew and his brother Tristan. I’ve been talking to them all week before the fight doing interviews, and he’s a very kind person.”

Andrew also took a distinct approach to marketing his bouts with the combat press, Says An interviewer from Love 2 Fight, a combat sports game, in 2013 came from a mysterious land called Wudan and was trained by a character named Master Po. This story was later incorporated into Tate’s misogynist training materials, illustrated with elaborate manga-style cartoons, and adopted by his followers.

“His fights were selling themselves,” Johal said. “He literally called himself ‘the cobra.’ Because like a cobra, his right hand, straight from behind, would knock most people out.”

Both brothers are successful in the ring. Andrew won many world title fights and Tristan won two British titles. Although it was not a profitable business, it did bring in some money. Andrew finally gets a sports car, an Aston Martin DB9, when he wins £10,000 from a fight.

Advertisement

“It was quite a strange thing because it was a one-bedroom apartment with an Aston Martin DB on the outside,” O’Halloran recalls. This led to the origin of Andrew’s famous nickname “Top G.” “We used to always say when we were younger, ‘What a better G’,” O’Halloran recalled. “The guy’s a big gangster here—he drives an Aston Martin.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Chuck E. Cheese still works on floppy disks – until now

Published

on

By

Of Chuck E. Cheese’s 600-plus locations worldwide, fewer than 50 still have the quarter-century-old “Studio C” design of animation electronics using these floppy disks. Other restaurants have a version of the show that uses contemporary technology, while some have no animation at all. (Ars Technica He has a story About Chuck E. Cheese’s floppy disk use with a more detailed breakdown of all the old technologies.)

Eventually, Chuck E. Cheese plans to phase out animation entirely and focus on new screen-based entertainment (plus a more retro approach: a living human in a mascot costume). fix was It was first announced in 2017but restaurant renovations are an ongoing process, and it may be a year or two before the last of the animatronics are scrapped.

Tom Persky is the owner floppydisk.com, the largest floppy disk provider still in existence. His business has a few weapons: You can buy blank disks through him or send old floppy disks to transfer to more modern storage media. Persky will also program discs for bulk order customers, and he confirmed to BuzzFeed News that Chuck E. Cheese was indeed a longtime customer of his. He said he was sad that he would lose the company as a customer.

As for why the restaurant still uses floppy disks, Persky told BuzzFeed News that the floppy technology, while outdated, is actually very reliable. “If you’re looking for something very stable, really impenetrable — it’s not internet-based, it’s not network-based,” Persky said. “She’s very elegant at what she does.”

Advertisement

Chuck E. Cheese’s press reps confirmed the series’ use of floppy disks with BuzzFeed News. However, they were very careful about what other information they were willing to share, and after a few days they told us that the company would not be officially involved in this story.

However, an experienced Chuck E. Cheese employee, who asked not to be identified because he is not authorized to speak on behalf of the company, echoed Persky’s sentiments.

“The floppy disks work surprisingly well. The animation, lighting, and rendering sync data are all in the floppy disks,” the employee told BuzzFeed News. SD. But newer setups usually cause issues with things, and it’s easier to keep the old stuff running.”

Even after Chuck E. Cheese phases out floppy disks, they’ll likely still be in use for some time in other areas – such as medical devices. While the thought of this might make you nervous, Persky insisted it was a good thing. “Why don’t you use USB? Well, let’s just say your life depends on it,” he said. If you have a choice between a USB drive or a floppy disk, choose the floppy disk every-time.

“It’s one thing if your animated bear isn’t smiling when cued,” he continued. “It’s another matter if your medical device breaks down.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending