Connect with us

Tech

Malcolm Harris on his historical and critical book “Palo Alto”

Published

on

on the shelf

Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World

Written by Malcolm Harris
Little, Brown: 720 pages, $36

If you purchase books linked to from our site, The Times may earn a commission from Bookshop.orgwhose fees are supported by independent bookstores.

Advertisement

Malcolm Harris good luck growing up Palo Altoa blessed piece of real estate in the American economy, lit by the sun of Silicon Valley and the pink sandstone glow of Stanford University’s campus.

He also had the good luck of making it out alive. In the years Harris attended Palo Alto, students killed themselves rate between four and five times the national average, walking to their deaths on the train tracks built by Leland Stanford to escape labor unrest in San Francisco more than 100 years ago.

Harris’ meal from the pressure cooker at Paly high was that it required a revolution to fix it, or something.

Advertisement

In high school, he was arrested on campus for handing out fliers telling kids they didn’t have to take the state standardized test. He marched against the Iraq war and established a new chapter of the Students for a Democratic Society When he entered college at the University of Maryland. There, he and his buddies began to occupy things—school buildings, oil company headquarters, and political conventions.

By the time he got to the first meeting of Occupy Wall StreetIn 2011, Harris had already begun researching and writing about the subtle ways the world is screwing up, specifically in education and student debt. his first bookkids these daysHow millennials became millennials through the dual phase of education and finance–forced to do more homework while the institutions they were assigned to continued to increase tuition.

But he knew he would eventually return to his hometown to explain our modern world, which is now dominated by tech companies and billionaires. On that day he will come to write his last book next week – “Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World.”

Malcolm Harris’s “Palo Alto” returns to the city that raised him and reveals the fraught history of a place that dominated American capitalism.

(Julia Burke)

Advertisement

We met up on a winter’s day in Washington, D.C., to spend a cold afternoon strolling the capital. Harris has lived on the East Coast since college (mostly in Philadelphia), but he still carries himself with a Northern California set of stone-cold vibes and a tightly wound core. He has a shock of red hair, like a cartoon version of a left-wing model, but dresses like a man who would rather disappear into a crowd. Ask a stupid question, as I often do, and he’ll dodge nicely, then tell you what’s wrong with your hypothesis and recommend something to read.

He spent most of the last few years reading hundreds of pages of research, eight hours a day—sometimes on a park bench in Philly, and most recently on a barge from a desk at the National Gallery, where the museum chief’s office was. It turned into an abandoned living room. His first iteration of the project was almost a memoir, but as he continued reading, he found more material that was largely untouched—or at least unwoven into a comprehensive history.

Like the story of the Palo Alto System: The Stanford Railroad Baron He first used the land that would become his university as a stud farm, training young horses on the brink of physical collapse. Either the colt will break down early – and be shot – or he will escape the system and live to advance the bloodline – and create more value for his eventual owners.

“When I talked to my brothers and other people who grew up in Palo Alto” about the system, Harris said, “they found it scary, the way they talked about young horses and early possibilities, the way we saw kids in Palo Alto kill themselves because they weren’t up to par.” .

Advertisement

“Palo Alto” traces the path from those early days to Silicon Valley now, tracing the way horse-meat eugenics and frothy capital behind gold and railroads made a perpetual machine that spewed scientific racism and hardline anti-labor politics returns on investment no matter the human cost. . It’s a sprawling tale, covering sensational stories like the possible assassination of Jane Stanford by the university’s first president; racial labor wars; mid-century communists on campus; the university’s role in the cocaine trade in the Gulf region; and links between high-tech corporations and international CIA plots.

Harris handles it all with stunning detail and charmingly beguiling metaphors – describing modern-day tech tycoons as “slack-legged puppets who got their hands on these historical powers” and “Mickey Mouse”. [surfing] Wave in a stolen wizard’s hat, flashes four fingers hanging.” And that’s just one syllable.

casing "pal alto," by Malcolm Harris.

Harris describes himself as a communist, and this analysis is peppered throughout the text, but he has a knack for simplifying complex dynamics to their blunt essentials. “Because the workers have always been quick to understand,” he wrote early, “the maximization of production tends to diminish.” “If we see this process from the point of view of the workers, it is not the owners who generously divide the returns of their investment with the workers, it is the workers who divide the returns of their further production with the shareholders.”

Nevertheless, Harris set out to write a fiercely marginal history, not an anti-technology book. “The book is not polemical. I am a Marxist, I wrote a Marxist book because I think this is the best way to get to the bottom of this historical situation.”

The Truth Harris Finds Out revolves around a few central characters, mostly the old men on the Stanford campus.

Herbert Hoover looms as a first-class graduate of Stanford in 1895, owner and manager of an international mine and the nucleus of a right-wing political mob whose eponymous institute is based on campus. Lewis Termanthe genetics-obsessed Stanford professor who popularized the IQ test, followed suit by his son Fred, who turned Stanford into a public and private powerhouse. William Shockleywho invented the transistor and became an eugenicist in the 1970s and 1980s, held the ball for a few more decades. George Schultz He runs it all the way to the 2000s, blessing Reagan and George W. Bush from the throne of the Hoover Institution. Meanwhile, the Stanford boys like Dave Packard, Vinod Khosla and Peter Thiel Investment continued to flow into the neighborhood with a dense network of companies spun off from Stanford Research.

Advertisement

“I thought I’d be more figurative” to connect the dots, Harris said, but the lines were already there: “Those horses were tools of war, and so were children who had been raised in Palo Alto for over 100 years, under the same notions of competence.”

The playbook remains the same, whether it’s Stanford & Hoover or Teal W Elon Musk In the field: maximizing profits by squeezing labor and ignoring regulators; absorbing massive capital and government investments; Justify your success after the fact with pseudoscientific theories about your innate superiority.

Black and white portrait of a man, woman and boy.

Railroad Baron Leland Stanford, Jane Stanford, and Leland Stanford Jr. 1878, from Who Killed Jane Stanford.

(from W.W. Norton & Company)

But it’s not quite the same as it used to be. Harris admits in Palo Alto that the story has, as he puts it, “stupid” with time. Technology is becoming less transformative, and game winners seem to be chosen at random via a venture capital lottery. investment companies such as Andreessen Horowitz They have declared that it is “time to build” companies that change the real world, only to pour billions into coded Vaporware.

Advertisement

If you want to understand Palo Alto today, watch Harris said.Shark tank. “It’s a moment-to-moment feeling of how the capitalists are moving in that moment,” Harris said. “It was so much fun during the pandemic—in the first episode, every single one of them was absolutely foaming at the mouth, and the money was free. Do you have an exercise ball? do it. And now they don’t care if someone has a perfectly logical business plan; If they don’t see the blast go off, they pass.”

Then what to do? The book ends with a call for the official dissolution of Stanford University, at least in Palo Alto, and the return of the campus to the indigenous people of the Bay Area. Harris finds it a reasonable demand, given the alternatives.

“I don’t think that’s less realistic than full employment; it’s no less realistic than Medicare For All, depending on your understanding of the situation,” Harris said. So what’s the point of issuing this kind of transitional request? Region “.

Leland Stanford, grieving the death of his son in 1884, decided to found his alma mater with the feeling that “the children of California will be our children.” Harris simply takes it at his word: “California kids? Well, that’s me, so you.”

Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Tech

Opinion: A ban on TikTok in the US is unlikely

Published

on

By

the The most downloaded app in the world It looks like it’s in hot water. The Biden administration last week demanded that China-owned TikTok be sold or face a national ban in the United States over security and privacy concerns. TikTok’s CEO will testify about those issues before Congress on Thursday.

The app presents real national security risks that the US government must deal with. But the truth is that a ban or forced divestment would be hard to come by.

Concerns are growing about TikTok’s troubling history of user data protection. class action Claiming that the app sends private, personally identifiable and biometric data to third parties without user consent settled for one of the largest payments in history. privacy claims – $92 million – in 2021. FBI and Department of Justice They are also investigating ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok, for using the app to monitor US citizens, including journalists. The United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and the European Union already TikTok ban on government devices. India banned the app nationwide in 2020.

Advertisement

ByteDance relies on the Chinese government’s approval to operate, which exposes it to pressure from companies like Meta to flee. Yet even while raising countless red flags due to its ownership structure and privacy concerns, TikTok is outperforming other major social media companies in the US, significantly shaping how people get information and remaining wildly popular. The company is more than 150 million monthly active users In the United States alone.

TikTok has already survived an attempted ban by the US government. The Trump administration first proposed banning the app in 2020, but that effort has stalled it Federal courtsWhich questioned the solidity of claims about national security risks and ruled that the move range exceeded of the emergency economic powers of the administration.

Additionally, banning the app raises significant First Amendment concerns. In 2020, along with a proposed ban on TikTok, the Trump administration attempted to ban WeChat, a Chinese-owned messaging and social networking app. But the US District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that because The role of WeChat As the only means by which many individuals can reliably communicate in China, the app has constituted a unique form of communication. Hence the prohibition of its use would be violated First Amendment rights. While TikTok doesn’t play the same primary communication role, similar arguments for the app’s distinction as a communication tool could subject any ban on private citizens’ use to widespread and time-consuming legal scrutiny.

For now, rather than ban, the Biden administration is proposing that ByteDance sell TikTok. There are some precedents for this process, including the US government’s successful effort to change ownership of Grindr via the multiagency federal agency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (that TikTok review). In March 2019, the commission used the power given to it under the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act to claim Grindr’s then-owner, the Chinese company Beijing Kunlun Tech Co. Ltd. sale, quoting we National security concerns The application accesses sensitive personal information. Just over a year later Forced divestment announcedAnd Grindr has been acquired by an investment group called San Vicente Acquisition Partners based in West Hollywood.

But since that sale, China has erected firewalls to protect TikTok and other Chinese tech companies. Amid legal challenges to banning TikTok, the Trump administration has tried Force a TikTok sale for an American company. But China’s Ministry of Commerce has since updated its list of “prohibited or restricted technology exports” to include “Personal information recommendation services based on data analysis. What this means in practical terms is that the Chinese government would need to approve any sale of TikTok that would allow foreign companies access to the app’s algorithm.

Advertisement

The Chinese government has also implemented a law allowing national security data audits for all Chinese companies, including ByteDance, to acquire gold shares, or a government financial stake, in ByteDance Company. In addition, the wide spread of TikTok is an opportunity for ByteDance to gain more users and develop powerful new technologies in areas such as artificial intelligence, Deep fakes and facial recognition. Under China’s civil-military integration program, these technologies have also become Chinese national security assets. Any divestment in TikTok would likely require the cooperation of the Chinese government in a deal that works against their interests.

For the United States, the political costs of banning TikTok will increase the longer there is no solution. More users are joining the app every day, making it an even more important communication tool. Concerns about TikTok’s security may be bipartisan, but they haven’t yet overcome the social media app’s popularity.

Aine Kukas is the author of Trafficking Data: How China is Winning the Battle for Digital Supremacy.

Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Tech

Lindsay Lohan, Jake Paul, and other celebrities have been accused of promoting cryptography

Published

on

By

In what became the latest in years, the Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday stated charges against a group of celebrities promoting crypto assets without properly disclosing that they paid for their endorsements.

Among the defendants are Lindsay Lohan, Jake Paul, Soulja Boy, Austin Mahone, Kendra Lust, Lil Yachty, Ne-Yo and Akon, according to a statement from the SEC.

The SEC charges focus on Justin Sun, described as a “crypto-asset entrepreneur,” who owns a few crypto companies, “for the unregistered offering and sale of crypto-asset securities Tronix (TRX) and BitTorrent (BTT), the SEC said. at its release.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the celebrities Named by the SEC, whose backgrounds range from music to social media to influencer pornography, they are accused of “illegal promotion of TRX and/or BTT without disclosing what they were compensated for doing so and how much they were compensated.”

The complaint was filed in federal district court in New York. In a statement, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said that Sun “induced investors to buy TRX and BTT by organizing a roadshow in which he and the popular promoters hid the fact that the celebrities got their tweets.”

With the exception of Soulja Boy and Mahone, the celebrities agreed to pay a total of more than $400,000 to settle the charges, without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the commission said.

Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Tech

Why you refused to hand over the TikTok document to Congress

Published

on

By

Fellow journalists who spoke to TikTok press representatives told me that company representatives open my emails to request comment with trepidation. One reporter said a rep told them I would always ask them to comment on an internal policy, a leaked document, or a new feature they didn’t even know existed. I am currently working on more challenging stories about the platform. (If you have any tips, please Call me for my Signal number.)

But these tough stories won’t focus on the company handing over data to Chinese authorities, or the security risks associated with its relationship with the Chinese state. Because I couldn’t find any evidence of either. I want to find that link, because like any journalist, I’m an egoist and I want to be the one to break a story like this. I’ve been trying for years to find any links to the Chinese state. I’ve spoken to dozens of TikTok employees, past and present, seeking such a connection. But I didn’t discover it.

I can not say that this link does not exist. But I can say that I and other more talented journalists have been walking away from the TikTok edifice. We now know that the company has Spy on journalists and has Workplace harassment issues. TikTok’s finances are constantly being leaked. But neither of us found the smoking gun. And I don’t think my fellow reporters are any less excited to find it than I am.

We are in a strange political situation. Donald Trump’s legacy continues in the way we have our own personal fantasies, which we either firmly believe are true or repeat so often that we forget the truth. Among those fantasies: TikTok is a sure risk. TikTok is a puppet of the Chinese state. TikTok is a Trojan horse waiting for Chinese President Xi Jinping to bring down the West.

Advertisement

trump She launched a series of advertisements online In 2020 it says, “TikTok is spying on you.” It’s a sentiment echoed by other politicians, including Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley, who is concerned about TikTok’s links to China.

None of this is true. At least as far as I can tell. However, hearing politicians on both sides of the aisle talk about it, it’s a verifiable fact. And they want to ban the app because of that.

These American politicians are taking a curiously Chinese approach: suppressing and censoring it in the interest of harmony, rather than allowing free enterprise from a corporation that has shown itself willing to bend over backwards to try to answer concerns, and has made it appear that it is. Good faith efforts to address issues as they arise.

We’ll likely see a lot of heat, not a lot of light, from Thursday’s congressional hearing. There will be the usual objections from TikTok that it has no connections to the Chinese government, and the usual threat from politicians that TikTok’s answers aren’t good enough. but for 150 million Americans Now with the app, we have to hope TikTok answers will suffice.



Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending