Connect with us

Tech

How to respond to “nearby related” scams

Published

on

I was driving home Saturday on Highway 110 when the music on the radio was interrupted by a phone call. The number displayed on the dashboard was (111) 111-1111 – an obviously fake number. I should have just let it go straight to voicemail, but for some reason I answered.

“Dad, you have to help me!” said a young, almost hysterical voice. “Please help me!”

It didn’t sound like it was any of my sons, but the caller was so upset, I couldn’t be sure. “Who is this?” I asked.

Advertisement

“Dad, it is I! I need help!” The caller replied, but then a different voice appeared and the elder asked if I would help my child. He said that if not, he was ready to put a bullet into the child’s brain.

I was sure that the crying child was not my eldest son. And I knew exactly where my youngest son was, so I was sure that it wasn’t him either. But when I demanded some evidence that this was, in fact, a baby of mine, the older caller threatened to send me baby fingers.

He pushed me to make a decision: Either agree to help (he hadn’t yet put a price on it), or say goodbye and send my child to a cartel south of the border, where some unspeakable atrocity awaited him. By then, I had recognized the call as a scam. I said goodbye.

It was an easy and correct decision, but still nerve-wracking. My wife checked in with my oldest son, who said he was fine and that the call was fake. My youngest son came out of his engagement just over an hour later.

My blood pressure returned to normal sometime after that.

Advertisement

How does the scam work?

Eric Arbuthnot, an FBI special agent, said that this type of “virtual kidnapping for ransom” is usually the work of prisoners in foreign prisons. Arbuthnot said they had been victimizing Hispanics in the United States for years until the operation expanded in 2015 with the help of English-speaking inmates in Mexico. Now, he said, bogus kidnappers are making thousands of cold calls to the United States from foreign boiler rooms every day, hoping to hit the phone of someone with a child or young relative.

These phone extortion schemes work like this: When you answer the phone, the caller will yell or cry something along the lines of, “Mom, Dad, help me!” The caller is counting on you to divulge the name of the child you think is in trouble, Arbuthnot said. Then the caller hands the phone to another person who threatens to kill, maim, or turn your child over to a cartel unless you send the money right away.

Typically, these scammers demand a ransom of just a few hundred dollars, Arbuthnot said, which they’ll want to send via Western Union or MoneyGram. The amounts are relatively modest because US laws and regulations discourage scammers from transferring large sums of money to other countries. But the scammers make up for this by falling back on their crimes in volume.

Aside from pretending to be on the phone, scammers don’t do much to cover their tracks. Arbuthnot said this is because they are already in prison and are not afraid of being sued in the United States.

Arbuthnot said the scammers ask their victims in California to wire money to Mexico, using the name of a real person who has some connection to the prison but who might not be wise to the scam. This person will then deliver the money to the jail for a small deduction. The goal is to collect the money as soon as it comes in, before the victim realizes it and tries to stop the payment.

Advertisement

“Once it’s collected, it’s gone,” he said.

What should you do

If you receive a call like this, the FBI’s advice is simple: hang up and track down your son or daughter to make sure the call was a hoax. It’s okay if you can’t find your child right away and have to jump through a few extra hoops to make sure — in the unlikely event that it’s a real ransom demand, the kidnapper will keep calling, Arbuthnot said.

He added that the number of actual kidnappings for ransom is dwarfed by the number of phantom kidnappings. Kidnappings of children on their way back from school, he said, are “extremely rare,” and these kidnappers will not contact you because they are not looking for money.

The New York State Department suggests trying to confirm the identity of the relative involved by asking the caller several questions that only your relative would be able to answer. Given the number of details people share about themselves on social media, however, this may not be a foolproof way to spot scams, warns Soren Mihajlovici, founder of cheat detector.

The person who called me and pretended to be my child didn’t use a name or suggest a gender, waiting to fill in those blanks. I wondered if I could get the older caller to put his hand away by tricking him into saying something patently false—say, by asking where he was holding my daughter—but I suspect he was up for it.

Advertisement

My wife offered a better idea: give my sons a secret phrase to say if they really do need urgent help, and don’t tell anyone else about it. But then we all have to remember what it is.

similar schemes

Other relatives in trouble scams use the same basic techniques but without the threat of imminent violence. The goal is to make you panic, and before you have a chance to really think through the situation, push the money.

One example is the “grandparenting scam,” where a senior gets a call from someone who says their grandchild needs help immediately—perhaps bailed out of jail or flown to a hospital after a car crash.

Scammers may tip their hand by claiming a payment method that doesn’t make sense in context. Arbuthnot said there are scammers asking for prepaid gift cards; In one case, a fraudster posing as an FBI agent wanted to be paid into Google Play cards. “The FBI never asks people for money, and if we did, it wouldn’t be in Google Play cards,” he said.

Not all relatives scams involve cold calling. Mihajlovici said some scammers will do some research on their victims first, “then contact credible reasons to claim a reward.” Arbuthnot said scammers may also choose targets by buying “lead lists” on the dark web of people who have fallen for scams in the past.

Advertisement

Mihajlovici said social media makes the task of gathering personal details easier. The scammers can identify parents or grandparents on Facebook, find their cell phone numbers online, and then “create personalized threatening conversations using children’s names, so victims really believe the scammers have children”.

“They throw in some other personal information (also collected from Facebook), such as certain hobbies of the kids, distinctive clothes, hairstyle or other assets they have, and then they paint a pretty believable picture of the parents/grandparents,” Mihailovici said. “That’s when they pay over the phone, or give away [credit card] Preparation.”

Last year, the Federal Trade Commission noted that scammers had started Collect cash in personFollow up on their calls by sending a rep to the victim’s home. One reason, Arbuthnot said, is that in-person deliveries can involve much larger sums of cash collected by agents (often inadvertently), who then send the money back from the United States in multiple batches. The other thing is that they work best for older victims who don’t have the ability or desire to find a Western Union office.

The pressure to act immediately and not consult anyone else is Giant red flag, says the FTC on its website. “Scammers play with your feelings,” says the agency. “They are counting on you to act quickly to help your family or friends. And they are counting on you to push nonstop to check if there really is an emergency. If you get a call like this, you can be sure it is a scam.”

Another tip-off, Mihailovici said, is when someone wants to get paid right away, while you’re on the phone. “If they ask you to pay now over the phone,” he said, “it’s 100% fraud.” That’s because legitimate companies or people who ask for real reminders of your final payments never ask for payment. [the] spot.”

Advertisement

If you are a victim of a scam

If you have fallen victim to a scam, you must report the scam to FTC through his online portal and into the FBI. The FTC also provides a list of steps you can take Try to get your money back; Whether you can do this depends on your payment method and how quickly you seek to cancel the payment.

According to the Federal Trade Commission, banks and finance companies that issue credit and debit cards can reverse fraudulent transactions. The same goes for money transfer companies like Western Union, but only if you’re in business before collecting the money. And if you mail cash, the US Postal Service may be able to intercept the package.

pay in CryptocurrencyThe FTC said, however, that would leave you with few remedies. So, too, you’ll be paying from your bank account through Zelle, which banks generally consider an authorized transfer and so Not reimbursable.

About the Times Utility Journalism Team

This article is from the Times’ facilities journalism team. Our mission is to be essential to the lives of Southern California residents by spreading information that Solve problems, answer questions, and help make decisions. We serve audiences in and around Los Angeles – including existing Times subscribers and diverse communities whose needs have not been historically met by our coverage.

Advertisement

How can we be of benefit to you and your community? Email tool (at) latimes.com or one of our journalists: Matt BallingerAnd John HealyAnd Ada TsengAnd Jessica Roy And Karen Garcia.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Tech

Lindsay Lohan, Jake Paul and Otras Celebrate Acosadas de Empulsar Las Cryptomonidas

Published

on

By

En el último ejemplo de lo que se ha convertido en una tendencia en el mundo de las criptomonedas, la Comisión de Bolsa y Valores anunció el miércoles cargos cont una gran cantidad de celebridades por impulsar los criptoactivos sin revelar adecuadamente que se les pagó por sus patrocinios.

Entre los acusados ​​se encontraban la estrella de “Mean Girls” y “Falling for Christmas” Lindsay Lohan, la personalidad de las redes sociales y el boxeador Jake Paul y el rapero Soulja Boy, según un comunicado de la SEC. Porn movies Kendra Lust y los músicos Lil Yachty, Ne-Yo, Austin Mahone y Akon también fueron nombrados en la denuncia de la agencia.

El foco teacher de los cargoes de la SEC es Justin Sun, descrito como un “empresario de activeos criptográficos” que posee un puñado de empresas relacionadas con las criptomonedas, including la Fundación Tron y la Fundación BitTorrent. Ha sido acusado “for la oferta no registrada y la venta de valores de criptoactivos (TRX) y BitTorrent (BTT)”, dijo la SEC en su comunicado.

Advertisement

Sun, de 32 años, es un ciudadano chino que realmente es elesentable Permanente de Granada ante la Organización Mundial del Comercio y se cree que live en Singapore o Hong Kong, dijo la SEC.

Vegas celebration nombradas por la SEC fueron acusadas de “promocionar ilegalmente” los tokens criptográficos TRX y / o BTT “sin revelar que fueron replaceados por hacerlo y el monto de su compensation”.

La denuncia fue presentada en un tribunal de distrito Federal in Nueva York. El Presidente de la SEC, Gary Gensler, dijo en un comunicado que Sun “indujo a los inversores a provar TRX y BTT al Organizar una campaña promocional en la que él y sus promotores famosos ocultaron el hecho de que a las celebridades se les pagaba por sus tuits”.

Con la excepción de Soulja Boy y Mahone, las celebridades accordaron pagar un total de more de $400,000 para relver los cargoes, sin admitir no negar los hallazgos de la SEC, dijo la comisión.

“Se contactó a Lindsay en marzo de 2022 y desconocía el requisito de divulgación”, dijo Leslie Sloane, portavoz de Lohan, en un correo electónico. “Ella accedió a pagar una multa para resilver el asunto”.

Advertisement

Ninguna de las otras siete celebridades, o sus Representantes, responseieron de mediato a las solicitudes de commentarios. Sun no pudo ser contactado de mediato para hacer comentarios.

La industry de la criptografía, que realmente atraviesa una recession prolongadaha tenido durante mucho tiempo una relación acogedora con las celebridades, que ofrecen publicidad y legalidad al mundo financiero, que de otro modo sería un nicho, complexado y, a menudo, plagado de estafas.

The Super Bowl of 2022 estuvo inundado of criptoanuncios repletos de estrellas (which is not available for use since 2023), y un segontró de “Tonight Show” de ese mismo año encontró a Jimmy Fallon y Paris Hilton mostrando sus tokens no fungibles (o NFT)una subclass specialmente espumosa de criptoactivos.

Pero esa relación cripto-celebridad no siempre termina bien.

En octubre pasado, la SEC multó a Kim Kardashian with más de 1 million por impulsar diferentes activos criptográficos, tokens criptográficos EthereumMax, en Instagram sin revelar que le pagaron por hacerlo. Se Presentaron Cargos Similar to Floyd Mayweather Jr. by DJ Khaled in 2018 and Steven Seagal in 2020.

Advertisement

Una demanda colectiva reciente buscó responsabilizar a Tom Brady, Larry David, Steph Curry, Shaquille O’Neal y otras celebridades y atletas de renombre por su promoción de FTX, la plataforma de comercio de criptomonedas que colapsó repentinamente a fasines del año colapsó repentinamente a fasines del año collapsó repentinamente a fasines del año colapsó.

Las últimas Presentaciones de la SEC arrojan Mas luz sobre las relaciones financieras en juego entre las personas famosas y la criptoeconomía.

An indica document that Lohan se le pagó $10,000 in February 2021 for promotional TRX tokens on Twitter. Según una captura de pantalla incluida en la presentación, Lohan tuiteó, usando el lenguaje que le dio una de las compañías de Sun: “Explorando #DeFi y ya me gusta $JST, $SUN en $TRX. Súper rápido y 0 fee. Buen Trabagojustinsuntron”.

Casi al mismo tiempo, según otra presentación, Paul promocionó TRX en Twitter “a cambio de un pago de criptoactivos, valorados en aproximadamente $25,019.” Nuevamente, Tron “le proporcionó a Paul el lenguaje específico para incluir en el Tweet”, dice la presentación de la SEC.

Read this note in English click here.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Opinion: A ban on TikTok in the US is unlikely

Published

on

By

the The most downloaded app in the world It looks like it’s in hot water. The Biden administration last week demanded that China-owned TikTok be sold or face a national ban in the United States over security and privacy concerns. TikTok’s CEO will testify about those issues before Congress on Thursday.

The app presents real national security risks that the US government must deal with. But the truth is that a ban or forced divestment would be hard to come by.

Concerns are growing about TikTok’s troubling history of user data protection. class action Claiming that the app sends private, personally identifiable and biometric data to third parties without user consent settled for one of the largest payments in history. privacy claims – $92 million – in 2021. FBI and Department of Justice They are also investigating ByteDance, the parent company of TikTok, for using the app to monitor US citizens, including journalists. The United States, the United Kingdom, Canada and the European Union already TikTok ban on government devices. India banned the app nationwide in 2020.

Advertisement

ByteDance relies on the Chinese government’s approval to operate, which exposes it to pressure from companies like Meta to flee. Yet even while raising countless red flags due to its ownership structure and privacy concerns, TikTok is outperforming other major social media companies in the US, significantly shaping how people get information and remaining wildly popular. The company is more than 150 million monthly active users In the United States alone.

TikTok has already survived an attempted ban by the US government. The Trump administration first proposed banning the app in 2020, but that effort has stalled it Federal courtsWhich questioned the solidity of claims about national security risks and ruled that the move range exceeded of the emergency economic powers of the administration.

Additionally, banning the app raises significant First Amendment concerns. In 2020, along with a proposed ban on TikTok, the Trump administration attempted to ban WeChat, a Chinese-owned messaging and social networking app. But the US District Court for the Northern District of California ruled that because The role of WeChat As the only means by which many individuals can reliably communicate in China, the app has constituted a unique form of communication. Hence the prohibition of its use would be violated First Amendment rights. While TikTok doesn’t play the same primary communication role, similar arguments for the app’s distinction as a communication tool could subject any ban on private citizens’ use to widespread and time-consuming legal scrutiny.

For now, rather than ban, the Biden administration is proposing that ByteDance sell TikTok. There are some precedents for this process, including the US government’s successful effort to change ownership of Grindr via the multiagency federal agency Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (that TikTok review). In March 2019, the commission used the power given to it under the Foreign Investment Risk Review Modernization Act to claim Grindr’s then-owner, the Chinese company Beijing Kunlun Tech Co. Ltd. sale, quoting we National security concerns The application accesses sensitive personal information. Just over a year later Forced divestment announcedAnd Grindr has been acquired by an investment group called San Vicente Acquisition Partners based in West Hollywood.

But since that sale, China has erected firewalls to protect TikTok and other Chinese tech companies. Amid legal challenges to banning TikTok, the Trump administration has tried Force a TikTok sale for an American company. But China’s Ministry of Commerce has since updated its list of “prohibited or restricted technology exports” to include “Personal information recommendation services based on data analysis. What this means in practical terms is that the Chinese government would need to approve any sale of TikTok that would allow foreign companies access to the app’s algorithm.

Advertisement

The Chinese government has also implemented a law allowing national security data audits for all Chinese companies, including ByteDance, to acquire gold shares, or a government financial stake, in ByteDance Company. In addition, the wide spread of TikTok is an opportunity for ByteDance to gain more users and develop powerful new technologies in areas such as artificial intelligence, Deep fakes and facial recognition. Under China’s civil-military integration program, these technologies have also become Chinese national security assets. Any divestment in TikTok would likely require the cooperation of the Chinese government in a deal that works against their interests.

For the United States, the political costs of banning TikTok will increase the longer there is no solution. More users are joining the app every day, making it an even more important communication tool. Concerns about TikTok’s security may be bipartisan, but they haven’t yet overcome the social media app’s popularity.

Aine Kukas is the author of Trafficking Data: How China is Winning the Battle for Digital Supremacy.

Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Tech

Lindsay Lohan, Jake Paul, and other celebrities have been accused of promoting cryptography

Published

on

By

In what became the latest in years, the Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday stated charges against a group of celebrities promoting crypto assets without properly disclosing that they paid for their endorsements.

Among the defendants are Lindsay Lohan, Jake Paul, Soulja Boy, Austin Mahone, Kendra Lust, Lil Yachty, Ne-Yo and Akon, according to a statement from the SEC.

The SEC charges focus on Justin Sun, described as a “crypto-asset entrepreneur,” who owns a few crypto companies, “for the unregistered offering and sale of crypto-asset securities Tronix (TRX) and BitTorrent (BTT), the SEC said. at its release.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, the celebrities Named by the SEC, whose backgrounds range from music to social media to influencer pornography, they are accused of “illegal promotion of TRX and/or BTT without disclosing what they were compensated for doing so and how much they were compensated.”

The complaint was filed in federal district court in New York. In a statement, SEC Chairman Gary Gensler said that Sun “induced investors to buy TRX and BTT by organizing a roadshow in which he and the popular promoters hid the fact that the celebrities got their tweets.”

With the exception of Soulja Boy and Mahone, the celebrities agreed to pay a total of more than $400,000 to settle the charges, without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the commission said.

Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Trending