Connect with us

Tech

How to get free broadband internet in southern california

Published

on

The White House announced Monday that low-income Americans now have more options for free high-speed Internet access, including at least eight providers serving Southern California.

Federal government Launched affordable calling program at the end of last year To provide a subsidy of $30 per month to families whose income is no more than twice the federal poverty level. But this support was less than the amount many ISPs charge for a high-speed connection fast enough to support an entire family of active users.

On Monday, the White House revealed that 20 broadband providers across the country, including five of the largest television and cable television companies, have agreed to provide “high enough” connections for no more than $30 per month to eligible homes. Eight of these serve communities in Southern California: AT&T, Comcast, Cox, Frontier, Mediacom, Spectrum, Starry, and Verizon.

Advertisement

As part of the agreement, the White House said, Spectrum — which serves most of Los Angeles County — doubled its $30 per month bandwidth from 50 to 100 megabits per second for eligible households. Verizon slashed the price of its 200Mbps wired offering from $40 to $30 a month.

Several other Internet providers in California participate in the affordable calling program, including some such as TruConnect that provide mobile broadband service. The only companies highlighted by the White House were those that provide 100 megabits per second connections for download at no cost to eligible households.

However, eliminating the cost of a broadband connection only removes one of the barriers to wider adoption of the Internet. Other obstacles include the need for a smart device and the knowledge to use it, said Sun Wright McPeak, president of the California Tech Emerging Fund.

However, the biggest problem may be that most people who qualify for benefits are not aware of or are not interested in them. For example, nearly half of Los Angeles County households have incomes low enough to qualify for the federal benefit, McPeak said, but less than a quarter of that group has registered. And the rest may be difficult to access; They are less likely to see online ads for a broadband service provider promoting subsidies, for example.

The White House said Monday that it is trying to raise the profile of the program by having federal safety net agencies tell participants about it, and by working with outreach efforts by public interest groups. The California legislature is also considering a bill (AB 2751) that may require state broadband service providers to offer and advertise affordable Internet connections to low-income households.

Advertisement

Here’s how to find out if you qualify for subsidies and which broadband providers they offer.

Am I eligible, and how do I apply?

cut off income is 200% of Federal poverty level, which is higher for larger families. For a single individual, the minimum is $27,180 per year. For a family of four, it’s $55,500.

But there’s an easier way to check your eligibility: You qualify for the program if anyone in your family is enrolled in at least one of 10 types of safety net programs, including food stamps, Medicare, Supplemental Security Income, Pell grants and the federal public housing subsidies. Recipients of select tribal benefit programs are also eligible, and subsidies on tribal lands are higher: $75 per month.

To find out if you are eligible or to apply, you can visitGet online‘, which can guide you through the process. mail app Also available on Get Internet; It can also be found in the Affordable Connection Program How to apply page. However, all of these resources require access to the Internet and a computer, tablet or smartphone.

If you have questions about how to apply but don’t have an internet connection, you can call the program’s Help Center at toll-free: (877) 384-2575.

Advertisement

Once your application is approved, your subsidies will flow directly to the participating broadband provider of your choice. To find one in your area, check out Program List, which you can search by zip code or city. The list includes more than 90 participating providers near Los Angeles, although many of these are companies that resell service on one of the major wireless networks.

If you already have Internet access, your broadband provider may have its own application process for subsidies. You should start by checking with your Internet Service Provider.

What services are available?

Subsidies will drive either a fixed line to your home or a mobile broadband connection to your smartphone. You’ll likely get more bandwidth from a fixed connection – wireless service providers usually apply much lower limits on how much data you can use per month.

The federal program also includes a $100 discount on low-cost laptops and tablets, but not many broadband providers offer hardware subsidies. The only exception among the state’s largest television and cable companies is Cox, which serves Santa Barbara and Lots of Orange and San Diego County.

There is one additional federal support of $10 per month, called Lifeline, that businesses in most states can combine with the Affordable Connection Program to fund services for eligible low-income families. Meanwhile, California has a special Lifeline support that adds about $15.50 to federal Lifeline assistance.

Advertisement

But Matt Johnson, TruConnect’s co-CEO, said California is the only state that won’t allow wireless companies to pool Lifeline and Connectivity Program funds into a single customer-optimized offering. He said cable TV and wired phone companies could do this — a point the California Public Utilities Commission disputes — but for wireless customers, that’s one or the other. As a result, he said, TruConnect cannot offer as much bandwidth to eligible households in California as it does in other states.

CPUC spokesperson Terry de Prosper said in an email that wireless and wired broadband providers currently receive the same amount of support, and none of them combine Lifeline and Affordable Connectivity support. She said the committee was reviewing the staff’s proposal to change that policy.

How many people still need broadband?

A survey conducted last year by the USC and the California Emerging Technology Fund found that 91% of Californians interviewed had access to the Internet. But the survey also found that more than a quarter of low-income Californians surveyed either have no internet (16%) or just a data plan on their smartphone (10%).

The survey authors said the lack of a high-speed connection at home makes it increasingly difficult to work, study or receive medical care remotely. In other words, it puts lower-income families at a greater disadvantage than they really are.

McPeak said one advantage of the latest White House push is that it will increase access to low-income families by trusted authorities. She said such efforts could yield important results; When her group and Los Angeles County joined forces in trying to spread the word about broadband support late last year, county enrollment soared. 43% in about three weeks.

Advertisement

But McPeak said many of these families still need reliable sources to persuade and help them get online. This requires funding for community groups that can overcome language and cultural barriers to adopt and improve digital literacy, she said.

How long will the support last?

Unlike its predecessor, now defunct Emergency Broadband FundThe affordable calling program has no expiration date. But Congress can choose at any time to cut the funding, which is one reason the California Tech Startup Fund pushed AB 2751, which would keep a version of the program alive if the Fed abandoned it.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Tech

Editorial: Do you think Big Tech’s thousands of layoffs signal an upcoming recession? Think again

Published

on

By

Amazon Lay off More than 18,000 workers. Salesforce is shed 8,000, and Twitter gave up thousands more.

While we should never underestimate the hardships of people facing unexpected layoffs, these announcements from big tech companies are not a full-scale tragedy for the American economy. What would be very bad is if we see a significant slowdown in the economy, which leads to more layoffs by companies large and small in a variety of sectors.

While job losses can be painful for workers, especially from long-term positions, the reality is that large-scale layoffs in tech are just a small blip on the American job market, with 160 million workers. In a strong job market, like the one we’re in right now, it’s close 1.4 million workers They are fired or laid off from their jobs in an average month. else 4 million Quit their jobs voluntarily. with more than 6 million workers When hiring each month, most of those who lose their jobs can count on relatively short periods of unemployment.

Advertisement

This is consistent with data on the length of time workers spend in a state of unemployment. The latest reports from December showed that the typical period of unemployment was less than Nine weeks.

Not working for nine weeks may still be a major hardship, but recently laid-off workers will be eligible for unemployment benefits, which are just around the corner. 40% of wages in most countries. Higher-paid workers, who would include most of the technology sector workers facing layoffs now, are also likely to get some savings to help them get through a period of unemployment.

Workers laid off by tech giants are also likely to be rehired more quickly than people in other sectors. the Unemployment rate In the information industry it was just 2.2% in December, compared to 3.5% overall.

But if our economy slows, and layoffs extend to other industries and business sizes, we could face the recession risks many economists fear from the Fed’s rate hikes. They are clearly designed to slow the economy and reduce employment. The rationale is that the economy was seeing too much demand, which drove up wages and prices.

The price increase aims to reduce the demand for housing, cars and other things. This would reduce the number of jobs in the hardest-hit industries, reduce workers’ bargaining power and lead to smaller wage increases and less upward pressure on costs and prices.

Advertisement

If this push to slow the economy goes too far, we will see a very different picture in terms of layoffs and resignations, as well as prospects for rehiring workers. In the strong job market we see today, layoffs outnumber layoffs nearly 3 to 1. In 2009, during the Great Recession, more people laid off – laid off temporarily It was almost 20% higher than the number of people leaving their jobs each month.

It was understandable that few people wanted to quit their jobs during the Great Recession. The prospect of finding new jobs was not very good. the typical period Unemployment extended to nearly 20 weeks by the beginning of 2010. Furthermore, many workers ended a period of unemployment by simply giving up their job search, rather than becoming employed. This was a terrible period for the tens of millions of workers who have been unemployed for periods of time and for those who care deeply about losing their jobs.

While this is very different from the job market we face today, where unemployment is at its lowest level in more than half a century, economists worry about the Fed’s interest rate hikes going too far and triggering another recession. The Fed is right to try to slow inflation, which is out of control at the end of 2021 and the early part of 2022. The housing market in particular has been seeing double-digit inflation.

The rate hikes have turned the picture in the housing market, as prices have stopped rising and are now falling in many parts of the country. The supply chain problems that drove price increases earlier in the recovery are largely gone, and prices for items like appliances and furniture are now coming down.

This is a great success story for the Federal Reserve. However, if it raised rates too high, leading to another recession, reports of widespread layoffs in tech — or in any sector — would be much worse news than they are today.

Advertisement

Dean Baker is chief economist at the Center for Economic and Policy Research. He is the author of several books including Forged: How Globalization and the Rules of Modern Economics Were Structured to Make the Rich Richer.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Screenshots made by an AI director from a fake movie rage Twitter

Published

on

By

Scofield soon realizes that he is not alone. A small cadre of movie-obsessed artists and artists have harnessed the power of generative AI tools to reimagine classic films – or create entirely new ones – from some of the world’s most iconic names. In December, creator Johnny Darrell went viral Jodorowsky You see, a reimagining of the classic film under the eyes of groundbreaking director Alejandro Jodorowski. Inspired by Darrell, Washington-based Rob Sheridan, former art director of Nine Inch Nails, used artificial intelligence to create Jodorowsky Fraser.

Sheridan, 42, calls this AI-powered movement “The New Unreal.” Practitioners include a painter based in New Zealand Create a western space on Instagram and a sculptor from Austin, Texas, Making fake sci-fi TV shows. Another content creator from India is using AI image generators to create his own rich font Sci-fi with a Southeast Asian flavor.

“We’re starting to see this technology as something like a dream engine, leveraging a kind of distorted visual awareness to explore things that never were, never will be, never could be,” Sheridan said. “They hit you in a weird way, because they feel like They are very reasonable.”

Scofield said he didn’t know why his Cronenberg business was catching fire so quickly. He’s posted several previous experiments on Imgur, Reddit, and Twitter, all of which only got between 50 and 100 likes. “The intention was not to create a clickbait site, but I think it turned into that,” he said. “A lot of people were reposting it and saying, This is terrible. This man does not understand Cronenberg at all.Each time they did, it spread further and incited another wave of criticism, which incited another, and another, and another.

Advertisement

Schoefield said the text of his tweet — simply “David Cronenberg’s Galaxy of Flesh (1985)” — could give the false impression that he was trying to deceive Twitter. “There is no real intent behind this title yet, Oh yeah, looks like that could be it,” he said. “But he seemed to really impress people, and I think someone like Cronenberg might be famous enough to have a fanbase.

He continued, “There are a lot of people who have opinions about what Cronenberg’s aesthetics are and what they are not, and what a bad interpretation of his style is.” He fears that people will think he is trying to reduce Cronenberg’s work to mere physical horror.

The frames themselves were created by giving Midjourney a “DVD screen” prompt of various scenes from the film The empire strikes. Then it was like: Everything is made of skin, joints, tendons, nerves, umbilical cords, stomach, and arteriesSchofield added.

Getting a photo creator to make blood was hard — like getting Cronenberg style. “You can’t even write ‘Cronenberg’ in Midjourney,” Scofield said. (Sheridan thinks it’s because of him: He made a series of Cronenberg-inspired photos for the Met Gala in May, and Soon after, the term “Cronenberg” was banned from the tool.)



Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Tech

We used AI to write articles about CNET writing with AI

Published

on

By

Technology news site CNET discovered that he uses artificial intelligence (AI) to write articles about personal finance without any prior advertising or explanation. The articles, which numbered 73, covered topics such as What is Zelle and how does it work?“And it has a small disclaimer at the bottom of every read” This article was created using automation technology and has been carefully edited and fact-checked by an editor on our editorial team. The subheadings in these articles read “CNET Money Staff” generated by artificial intelligence.

The use of AI to write these articles was first revealed by a Twitter user, and further investigation revealed that the articles had been created using AI since November 2022. The extent and form of AI currently used by CNET is not known as the company did not respond to questions about their use for artificial intelligence.

The use of AI in journalism raises questions about the transparency and ethics of this practice as well as the potential impact on the veracity and accuracy of news. In addition, it also raises concerns about the implications it may have on SEO and Google searches. The lack of response from CNET regarding their use of AI in writing articles has heightened concerns and sparked a broader discussion about the future of journalism and AI’s role in it.

Note: This entire article was written by ChatGPT and reviewed by a human editor. (In fact, we had to rewrite the prompt several times to get it to stop throwing real-world errors. Also, CNET did not respond to a human journalist’s request for comment.)

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending