Connect with us

Tech

Editorial: US Federal Data Protection and Privacy Act protects everyone’s data

Published

on

When a company refers to “whites only,” it doesn’t matter whether it’s written in ink, pixels, words, or code. The distinction is the same. The damage is the same. The legal consequences must be the same.

However, our laws and courts often treat them Distinguish online differently. Because there is no comprehensive federal online privacy law, online entities can collect, use, buy and sell data about our identities and thus discriminate against us. Bipartisan legislation making its way through Congress can now change this.

Everyday life – including finding a job, buying a home, starting a business, and shopping – happens now online. Civil rights in online commerce are just as important as equal opportunity on a personal level.

Advertisement

Existing anti-discrimination laws often don’t help because they were written before the Internet was created. Some, including the 1964 Civil Rights Act, do not cover stores or have unresolved questions about how they apply to online businesses. Others apply only to specific sectors, such as housing and employment, but may not cover new types of algorithmic services that match individuals to these opportunities, or new forms of commerce such as influencers or gaming. Some federal laws do not apply to discrimination based on gender or religion.

Under current federal law, it is legal for Online retailer To charge women higher prices or refuse to sell products to them Christians. Algorithms used in targeting Ads Decision making often leads to unequal results in LivingAnd the RecruitAnd the creditAnd the Health CareAnd the education And the Other companies. Individuals have little recourse to algorithms and artificial intelligence models that reinforce the prejudice and racism that permeate our society as a legacy of historical separation. Consistently, it has been proven that black and brown individuals as well disproportionately affected Through discriminatory uses of personal data.

Meta owner of Facebook, for example, recently Settlement of a civil rights lawsuit The Department of Justice introduced it and agreed to change practices that presented housing ads in a way that discriminated against people of color. Academic research showed that facial recognition technology disproportionately discriminates against black and black people, and specifically misidentifies black women. Amazon sometime consulted recruitment algorithm that penalized resumes to include the word “women’s” and gave lower priority to applicants than two women-only colleges.

All of this can be handled by US Data Protection and Privacy Acta Bipartisan and bicameral effort To protect data privacy and civil rights online. The legislation is one of the most significant developments in federal Internet policy in decades. It would build our civil rights infrastructure to combat discrimination in a data-driven economy. Recently applied off the committee with Overwhelming support: 53-2 . ​​vote.

US Data Protection and Privacy Act Protects civil rights online. Discriminatory uses of personal data are prohibited; Requires bias testing of algorithms that determine access to and eligibility for underlying economic opportunities; requires companies to collect, use, or share data only as much as is necessary to provide the services consumers expect; It provides for reasonable enforcement. Most importantly, the bill allows individuals to sue companies that violate their rights. The Federal Trade Commission, state attorneys general and government privacy agencies will also be able to enforce the law.

Advertisement

There are ways the legislation could be improved, such as adding a requirement that companies use independent auditors to test their algorithms. But overall, the law is a critical step toward ensuring that all Americans have equal opportunities online, meaningful privacy rights, and equal access to online goods and services.

Like any bipartisan bill, a compromise is necessary to enact it. The US Data Protection and Privacy Act prohibits some state laws that address the same issues, while preserving other issues such as civil rights or consumer protection laws.

California has better privacy laws compared to other states, but that doesn’t mean they are really strong and objective. Some in California don’t want its laws repealed. But state laws cannot extend beyond the respective states. Consumers in other nations should not be left vulnerable; The price of achieving protection for all is a unified federal standard. The price is exorbitant, but it is worth it.

Moreover, according to Analysis by privacy advocatesThe proposed federal law is stronger than any state data protection laws, including those of California.

For example, unlike federal legislation, state data laws do not expressly prohibit discriminatory uses of information collected online. It does not require that algorithms be tested for bias or that companies provide consumers with privacy by design. They do not provide the right to sue.

Advertisement

The analysis shows that the federal bill also contains stronger provisions to protect children’s data, track location and health information, and regulate data brokers.

Privacy rights are civil rights. Data privacy laws must ensure that our identity cannot be used unfairly against us. Lawmakers need to protect all Americans by passing the US Data Protection and Privacy Act.

David Brody is a management attorney at Digital Justice Initiative In the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Tech

Screenshots made by an AI director from a fake movie rage Twitter

Published

on

By

Scofield soon realizes that he is not alone. A small cadre of movie-obsessed artists and artists have harnessed the power of generative AI tools to reimagine classic films – or create entirely new ones – from some of the world’s most iconic names. In December, creator Johnny Darrell went viral Jodorowsky You see, a reimagining of the classic film under the eyes of groundbreaking director Alejandro Jodorowski. Inspired by Darrell, Washington-based Rob Sheridan, former art director of Nine Inch Nails, used artificial intelligence to create Jodorowsky Fraser.

Sheridan, 42, calls this AI-powered movement “The New Unreal.” Practitioners include a painter based in New Zealand Create a western space on Instagram and a sculptor from Austin, Texas, Making fake sci-fi TV shows. Another content creator from India is using AI image generators to create his own rich font Sci-fi with a Southeast Asian flavor.

“We’re starting to see this technology as something like a dream engine, leveraging a kind of distorted visual awareness to explore things that never were, never will be, never could be,” Sheridan said. “They hit you in a weird way, because they feel like They are very reasonable.”

Scofield said he didn’t know why his Cronenberg business was catching fire so quickly. He’s posted several previous experiments on Imgur, Reddit, and Twitter, all of which only got between 50 and 100 likes. “The intention was not to create a clickbait site, but I think it turned into that,” he said. “A lot of people were reposting it and saying, This is terrible. This man does not understand Cronenberg at all.Each time they did, it spread further and incited another wave of criticism, which incited another, and another, and another.

Advertisement

Schoefield said the text of his tweet — simply “David Cronenberg’s Galaxy of Flesh (1985)” — could give the false impression that he was trying to deceive Twitter. “There is no real intent behind this title yet, Oh yeah, looks like that could be it,” he said. “But he seemed to really impress people, and I think someone like Cronenberg might be famous enough to have a fanbase.

He continued, “There are a lot of people who have opinions about what Cronenberg’s aesthetics are and what they are not, and what a bad interpretation of his style is.” He fears that people will think he is trying to reduce Cronenberg’s work to mere physical horror.

The frames themselves were created by giving Midjourney a “DVD screen” prompt of various scenes from the film The empire strikes. Then it was like: Everything is made of skin, joints, tendons, nerves, umbilical cords, stomach, and arteriesSchofield added.

Getting a photo creator to make blood was hard — like getting Cronenberg style. “You can’t even write ‘Cronenberg’ in Midjourney,” Scofield said. (Sheridan thinks it’s because of him: He made a series of Cronenberg-inspired photos for the Met Gala in May, and Soon after, the term “Cronenberg” was banned from the tool.)



Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Tech

We used AI to write articles about CNET writing with AI

Published

on

By

Technology news site CNET discovered that he uses artificial intelligence (AI) to write articles about personal finance without any prior advertising or explanation. The articles, which numbered 73, covered topics such as What is Zelle and how does it work?“And it has a small disclaimer at the bottom of every read” This article was created using automation technology and has been carefully edited and fact-checked by an editor on our editorial team. The subheadings in these articles read “CNET Money Staff” generated by artificial intelligence.

The use of AI to write these articles was first revealed by a Twitter user, and further investigation revealed that the articles had been created using AI since November 2022. The extent and form of AI currently used by CNET is not known as the company did not respond to questions about their use for artificial intelligence.

The use of AI in journalism raises questions about the transparency and ethics of this practice as well as the potential impact on the veracity and accuracy of news. In addition, it also raises concerns about the implications it may have on SEO and Google searches. The lack of response from CNET regarding their use of AI in writing articles has heightened concerns and sparked a broader discussion about the future of journalism and AI’s role in it.

Note: This entire article was written by ChatGPT and reviewed by a human editor. (In fact, we had to rewrite the prompt several times to get it to stop throwing real-world errors. Also, CNET did not respond to a human journalist’s request for comment.)

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Elon Musk has officially lost more private money than anyone else in history

Published

on

By

Bill Buckner. Justin Guarini. Everyone who “ran” against Vladimir Putin. Now Elon Musk has joined the ranks of the biggest losers in history. the Awarded by the Guinness Book of World Records CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and Twitter, a record-breaking loss of personal wealth. Forbes has estimated that in the past year or so, Musk’s wealth has declined by $182 billion.

In November 2021, Musk’s wealth peaked at nearly $320 billion, making him the richest man in the world. Most of that, however, was Tesla stock, which has plummeted in value through 2022. His October 2022 purchase of Twitter for $44 billion — which he financed with some of his Tesla stock — also caused a huge buzz in his bottom line.

In December, Musk’s losses stripped off His top of Forbes existingAnd the title of the richest person in the world went to Bernard Arnault from the LVMH Group, which owns such luxury brands as Louis Vuitton, Dior and Sephora. Forbes noted That many other billionaires will take big losses in 2022, when technology stocks will be hit hard. Jeff Bezos lost $85 billion, and Mark Zuckerberg saw $77 billion of his wealth disappear.

The previous world record for largest loss of personal wealth was held by Masayoshi Son, CEO of Softbank, who lost more than $59 billion during the dot-com crash of 2000. Today, Son is ranked 67th on Forbes’ list of billionaires.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending