Connect with us

Tech

Ari Emanuel lets his AI alter ego open Endeavor’s earnings call

Published

on

Corporate executives often sound like bots during their post-earnings conference calls with Wall Street analysts.

Ari Emanuel, CEO of talent agency Endeavor and owner of the UFC, has taken this idea to an extreme. On Tuesday afternoon, a synthetic version of Emanuel’s voice delivered the opening remarks on Endeavor’s fourth-quarter earnings call, rather than Emanuel himself.

Emmanuel’s voice was reproduced using technology from Florida-based Speechify, a company that provides text-to-speech software. Endeavor became a minority investor in Speechify last year. One of the English-speaking voices featured on Speechify is Snoop Dogg, a client of Hollywood talent agency WME, which is owned by Beverly Hills-based Endeavor.

Advertisement

We used a recording of Ari’s voice and our own generative AI [artificial intelligence] “A system for creating a synthesized version of Aryan’s voice,” Speechify CEO Cliff Weitzman said in a statement.

Speechify launched a new product line on Tuesday that will Create AI voice-overs.

It took just over six months of testing and learning to create a synthetic version of Emmanuelle’s voice, according to Endeavor. The company said it is looking at potential opportunities in artificial intelligence for Endeavor and its customers.

So is Ari Emanuel, the voice of the AI, ready for the role of Ari Emanuel, the entertainment mogul?

Good enough, perhaps, to handle the earnings call’s open notes, which are usually a sober summary of a company’s results with bullish generalities about the company’s overall position in the industry.

Advertisement

“As we end our first full year as a public company, we are encouraged by our performance in 2022,” the AI ​​voice told Emanuel. “We have seen strong growth across our sectors. Our business has proven resilient despite persistent macroeconomic headwinds.”

Actual human Emanuel handled the Q&A portion of the call, fielding questions from the analysts about the business specifics. He said this is the right time to put Speechify’s technology on the quarterly earnings call, “so you can hear what it’s like.”

The effort comes as the industry grapples with new technologies that could change the way production and writing are handled in batches. It is an issue written by the Writers Guild of America may cure In its upcoming negotiations with studios, it regulates the AI ​​in writing, along with concerns about payment from broadcasting and the use of so-called mini-rooms. Studios are already preparing for the possibility of a strike by film and television writers.

The real Emanuel addressed the prospect of a business outage and whether it would hurt Endeavor’s business.

“I think we’re well positioned in terms of the strike,” Emanuel said, citing the company’s diversified business, which includes sports and music. “A large percentage of our economy comes from outside writing, directing businesses.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Tech

This AirPods feature Let Grandpa Hear Me Again

Published

on

By

As he approached ninety, the ABBA world shrank. He spent his days reading and watching TV, listening to audio through a pair of oversized wireless headphones over his ears with the volume turned up to the max. He still wore his hearing aids, but as the condition of his ears worsened, the devices became less effective. Simple conversations were now superhuman efforts that ended in screaming at matches and frustration.

“Do you want dinner?”

“do you feel sleepy?”

“Can I have some tea?”

Advertisement

Phone calls were impossible—Abba had to put his phone on speakerphone, press it directly to his ear, and tell the person on the other end to shout as loudly as he could. In the end, “talking” to ABBA on the phone meant making a video call to him and smiling and waving at him.

When I visited him in the fall of 2022, I was wearing a pair of AirPods, and he pointed to my ear with a puzzled expression on his face.

“headphones!” Screamed. “I use it to listen to music!”

And then, I wondered if I could use it for something more substantial.

In 2018, Apple made Live listen, an iOS feature that allows iPhones and iPads to transmit audio from their microphones directly to compatible hearing aids, works with regular AirPods. I never had a reason to use the feature myself, but now I’m curious. Can Live Listen help me have a conversation with my grandfather after all these years?

Advertisement

I took my AirPods out of my ear and put them into his body. I turned on Live Listen on my iPhone, held it close to my mouth, and spoke to it.

“Hi, can you hear me?”

Abba’s face smiled, and he nodded excitedly. “I can hear you! I can hear you!”

AirPods are not my favorite Apple product. I think it’s overpriced, and it doesn’t look great for what you pay. But it’s also true that no other wireless earbuds work seamlessly with iPhones, which is why they’re the default wireless earbuds for most people, myself included.

They are also an environmental hazard. Vice named AirPods “fossils of future capitalism”, destined for landfills once their tiny batteries, encased in hard plastic, wear out after two years. And I resent the fact that Apple got rid of headphone jacks that work so well and made people pay for something they used to get in the box for free.

Advertisement

But with Live Listen, the AirPods helped me reconnect with my grandfather in a way no other device could. I’m willing to step over my fears for that.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

The outgoing Twitter employees are preparing a legal campaign against the world’s richest man

Published

on

By

For months, as the will-they-won’t-they dramatize between Elon Musk and Twitter persistedHelen-Sage Lee stuck to her belief that the social media company was a workplace worth fighting for.

“We all believed in the product so much that most of us decided to stay to see it,” Lee, who worked on the platform’s account safety team, said of the purchase and job insecurity it presented to employees. “And I felt comfortable doing that because of the separation HR and Law promised in May, and again in October.”

However, this assertion was misplaced, Lee now contends. With the help of Calabasas-based attorney Lisa Bloom, Lee sued in arbitration against Musk — the world’s richest man by some counts — for failing to follow through on the financial obligations that Twitter’s newest CEO now holds.

Advertisement

It’s one of the many legal actions brewing in the wake of the billionaire’s chaotic and massive tech acquisition, Amid sectionwidespread shrinkageleaving many outgoing Twitter employees scrambling for money and employment and feeling shut out.

On November 3, just days later Buy it closed, Musk successfully quelled rumors of mass layoffs with a company-wide email saying job cuts were about to happen. That night, Lee watched anxiously as co-workers flooded the workplace online on Twitter with emoji greetings and blue hearts.

Then it was my turn to go. Her laptop shut down at 9 p.m., she said, and her company access was revoked: “This was when I felt really lonely.”

However, perhaps the strongest blow of all came a day later, when, on November 4, the company sent more details on what the layoffs would look like.

“We received information that the severance package we were expected to receive next week would be significantly less than what we were initially promised prior to the acquisition,” Lee told a press conference Monday morning hosted by Blum, her attorney. “The severance package was a constant in a turbulent time that we depended on, and many of us are willing to take legal action.”

Advertisement

She added, “I’m here today because I want to keep Twitter accountable.”

musk claimed Repeatedly Those who have been laid off will receive severance pay for three months. But the terms of his deal buy Twitter obligate him To offer a severance package “no less favorable” than that promised by her former leadership, which is the basis for the arbitration claim that Lee and Bloom are now filing.

The pre-acquisition package offered at least two months of severance pay plus prorated performance bonuses, extended visa support, money for continued healthcare and cash value of shares that will vest within three months, according to laid-off employees as well as company documents reviewed by The Times. Times.

Internal emails indicate that those laid off are now stuck in a bind of “inactive” work, in which they remain nominally employed — and constantly paid — for a few months, but are not actually employed by the company. There was confusion among these employees as to whether the salary they were currently receiving was their severance pay or their normal pay. (It is not uncommon for companies to offer the equivalent of two months of severance pay in order to bypass the mandatory 60-day waiting period required amid widespread layoffs under the Federal WARN Act.)

Twitter employees love it [Lee] They were told in writing by human resources or legal that after the acquisition they would receive the same severance benefits that Twitter employees had before the acquisition,” Bloom said. “That’s an enforceable promise” — a promise Musk has since broken, she added.

Advertisement

They get paid until January 4th. [but] explained Bloom, who set her sights on the technology infractions in the past. “The previously pledged chapter also entitles them to their pro rata bonuses and the vesting of their shares for up to three months after their last day. … This is what they are denied.”

Departing employees say the company has been unusually slow in providing information about how the payment process will work, and confusion reigns over what final package the company will give people. Employees on work visas or those who were on parental leave when they were laid off have more questions.

Two other laid-off employees, Amir Chefat and Adrian Trejo Nunez, also spoke at the Bloom conference. Both are pursuing their own arbitration claims against Musk. (Most Twitter employees waived their right to file a class action lawsuit when the company joined them, Bloom said, requiring individual arbitration claims to pursue.)

“The way Elon Musk implemented the layoffs was really inhumane,” said Schivat, who was the lead product for Twitter’s developer platform.

“I applied to help myself and my former users” — or Twitter employees — “to receive our compensation that was specified in the agreement, which has since changed,” added Nunez, who was a senior software engineer.

Advertisement

Bloom said she has other clients, too, and is actively urging more laid-off Twitter employees to join her.

“My law firm represents a large group of workers and contractors on Twitter, and we will continue to file these cases, one by one, bombarding Twitter with allegations,” she said. “We’re hitting Twitter and Elon with every applicable claim, from promissory note, to breach of contract, to breach of their implied agreement, to violation of the WARN law, to civil rights violations.”

Bloom isn’t the only one moving against Musk.

On Thursday, attorney Akiva Cohen I sent a message to a tech mogul threatening a legal campaign on behalf of his group of laid-off Twitter employees.

“If you have not confirmed unequivocally by Wednesday, December 7th, that you intend to provide our customers with the full severance Twitter promised them, we will initiate an arbitration campaign on their behalf,” Cohen wrote.

Advertisement

As with Bloom’s clients, Cohen said he will pursue each complaint one by one, and added that Twitter will have to pay arbitration fees in accordance with California law.

“You will not only lose in terms of merits,” said the lawyer, “but even if you gain victory in some way it will be Pyrrhic.” “Twitter will pay significantly more attorneys’ fees and arbitration costs than it can ‘save’ in severance pay.”

In laying out his legal case, Cohen cited the same contract terms that Bloom relied on, noting that Musk was required to match severance packages prior to the acquisition, including employee bonuses and shares acquired. He also said some of his customers have reported that Twitter doesn’t provide them with 401k deductions and company matches, among other corporate benefits.

“I’m sure I don’t need to warn you that this is a bad idea,” Cohen said.

The attorney did not immediately respond to a request for comment on how many clients he works with or whether Musk provided any response to the letter.

Advertisement

Twitter, which no longer has an official communications team, could not be reached for comment.

Twitter’s mass layoffs have been coming for a long time.

Musk ended his control of Twitter on Oct. 28 after months of trying to undo a $44 billion takeover he initiated in April. But as early as June, he was referring to it Possibly layoffs prove necessary To lower Twitter’s costs and make the company profitable.

Even before the purchase is completed, it is he told investors In one report he planned to lay off 75% of the company (although he later denied this figure).

At the beginning of November, Musk was laid off nearly 50% from the company, with a promise of a three-month severance for those left.

Advertisement

After the layoffs, Musk was almost immediately fired Lawsuit by former employees who allegedly violated federal and state labor laws.

With waves of managers and employees resigning or being fired for speaking out against Musk’s new regime, he issued an ultimatum: Commitment to the new “hardcore” Twitter 2.0 where employees are expected to work long hours, or leave with a three-month layoff. But after receiving thousands of employees Take the exitleft many wondering if the company would live up to its promises.

The rising tide of legal cases against Musk — at least with respect to many of his outgoing employees — suggests that the answer to that question has been a resounding no.

Times staff writer Jamie Ding contributed to this report.



Source link

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Tech

Facebook almost sold its tech portal to Amazon Alexa devices

Published

on

By

In November, Meta announced that it was discontinuing Portal, its standalone video chat machine. The decision came as Meta The first mass layoffs Amid falling stock prices and worries about its ambitions in Metaverse.

Over the years, BuzzFeed News’ coverage of Meta and Facebook has been unwavering strict and sometimes hostile. our reviews The portal also spoke the truth: this was a really great product. we lovable He. She. I lovable He. She. Rest in peace, Portal – you were a good little rig.

The portal was born in a cruel world. released in fall 2018, Cambridge Analytica The bogus scandal — about Facebook’s botched user data handling and (in hindsight) exaggerated claims about its impact on the 2016 election — was still fresh in the public’s mind. It was also still fresh in the minds of the tech press who would review the devices. For many, the idea of ​​letting the always-on camera-powered Facebook device into your home was akin to sending your Pornhub history directly to the Kremlin.

Despite this, the portal has been selling well, Meta’s chief technology officer Andrew Bosworth told BuzzFeed News in an interview. (Meta declined to divulge exact sales figures, but Bosworth estimated the number of units sold in “the millions”) More importantly, Bosworth added, “This was a product that the people who bought it loved.” And it appealed to a different demographic than most devices: It sold a lot more with women and people over 40.

Advertisement

Ultimately, the decision to pull the plug came about because executives didn’t see a path to Gateway becoming a huge company (rather than just a good business), and with changing priorities at Meta, it didn’t work out. “We’re very sad about it,” Bosworth said. “You know the saying, ‘There is no priority unless it hurts’? It hurts.” (Not a complete loss though: Existing gateway devices will continue to function and receive support.)

Bosworth said that “the whole smart home category has been undermining expectations for a while now.” He added, “I think if you go back to where we expected the smart home as an industry to be when Portal entered the market versus where it is today, it wasn’t as successful as we expected it to be.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending